There must be enough gold left to pay for the material components to cast the spell. No Mythic tiers, though content from Mythic Adventures/Origins is allowed. Casting from a scroll is an acceptable method, though I would prefer repeatablility. Resonant powers for Ioun Stones are determined via Method 1. For instance, Void Shard counts as raising the DC of Circle of Death by 2. Items that impose a penalty, such as Void Shard, count as improving the DC of the spell by that much. Ally/Army Across Time, Simulacrum, Planar Binding, and Planar Ally are not available. Similarly, Magic Missile Heightened to 9th-level is not able to be cast by a level 12 character and thus not allowed. Wish is not able to be cast by any level 12, and therefore not available. For example, Psychics get Ethereal Jaunt as a 6th-level spell, and are able to cast it at level 12, so it is available. Available spells (from items, spellcasting services, etc.) are restricted to spells that only casters level 12 or lower could cast. You are not allowed to debuff the targets of the spell. Aside from permanent/instantaneous duration spells, you are allowed to factor in 1 round of buffs. Custom magic items are not allowed, you are restricted to printed magic items only. Crafting magic items is allowed, but you are restricted to a total of 1.5 Wealth-by-level for a level 12 character. 
Pathfinder content written in D&D 3.5 (Elves of Golarion, Curse of the Crimson Throne, etc.) are not allowed.
At least 3 unused general feat slots and a bonus feat slot (if the archetype removes bonus feat slots, 4 general slots must be left open.). Level 12 Wizard (you may choose an archetype, as long as it has a familiar). So I don't think you'll see designers saying "dazing spell shouldn't work like that" though you can probably find several comments like "If we knew then what we know now, we would have written some things differently.What is the highest possible DC for Circle of Death? Mainly because it was the first hardcover expansion and no one was really sure what the scale was going to be. It's a pretty well-known (and pretty potent) combo.ĪPG is probably the book with the most out-of-scale options. I don't think he explicitly said it this way but the subtext was "I'm sick of dazing."īy the way here is a link to a blog-post villain from about 5 years ago who uses dazing aqueous orb. I did have an in-person conversation with a designer at PaizoCon a couple of years ago where he mentioned deliberately putting in anti-dazing protections for NPCs in a scenario because it was too easy for players to use daze to shut down what was supposed to be an epic fight. I haven't seen any messageboard designer comments around "should dazing spell exist" like the spellhunter/lineage comment from Mark. Is there any designer's comment on Dazing spell? Looks like the only way is to talk to my player.Ībout the P.P.S, I convinced my player(the same player) not to use the magical lineage + Wayang spellhunter according to the response of designer Mark Seifter. 
Particularly with magical lineage and Wayang spellhunter traits. Wait until your player discovers adding Persistent Spell to the orb. Dazing Spell is widely regarded to be one of the most overpowered options in the game. Ask him to let others shine and only pull out his “big gun” when the PCs are in real trouble. You can (and should) talk to your player about being a “good gaming citizen.” If you’re able to make every encounter a cakewalk, you shouldn’t. If you’re playing just the PFS sanctioned parts of an AP with regular PFS characters that’s not an option. As the GM, though, you can decide to limit anything however you want if you are playing in campaign mode.
Dazing Spell happens “when a creature takes damage from a spell,” which can happen on multiple rounds. Does it work the way your player wants it to? By rule, yes.Ĭan you use Furious Spell as a limiter? By rule, no.
0 kommentar(er)
